India Expresses Deep Concern at UN Security Council Over Hormuz Attacks; Backs Two-State Gaza Policy

India, during its intervention at the United Nations Security Council, expressed 'deep concerns' over the escalating attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and other regions, while simultaneously reaffirming its support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This statement reflects India's balanced approach to Middle East geopolitics, addressing both the Hormuz shipping crisis and the broader Gaza conflict.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints, with approximately 21% of global petroleum and liquefied natural gas passing through it. Recent attacks attributed to Iran-backed groups (Houthis, militia groups) have disrupted international shipping, increased insurance costs, and threatened global energy supplies. India, as a major importer of crude oil and a country with significant shipping interests, has a direct stake in maritime security in the region. At least 13 Indian seafarers remain stranded at Ukrainian ports following similar attacks.

India's statement at the UNSC included three key elements: (1) concern over freedom of navigation and maritime commerce disruption; (2) calls for de-escalation and peaceful resolution; (3) support for a two-state solution for Gaza, reflecting India's broader Middle East policy of maintaining relations with both Arab states and Israel. This balancing act is crucial—India sources 40%+ of oil from the Gulf, maintains strong security partnerships with Gulf states, and simultaneously has growing ties with Israel in defence, technology, and trade sectors.

This is crucial for UPSC examinations on India's foreign policy, maritime security, Middle East geopolitics, and UN engagement. Questions test understanding of India's position on regional conflicts, freedom of navigation principles, and India's energy security concerns. This also connects to India's role as a permanent member aspirant of the UNSC and its strategic autonomy in foreign policy.