In Brief
Affirms the legality of removing names of deceased, shifted, or duplicate voters during Special Intensive Revision of rolls.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that there is no legal infirmity in deleting the names of deceased individuals, those who have shifted out of their respective wards, or duplicate entries during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The apex court's observations clarify that the administration is legally permitted to prune outdated or incorrect entries during the revision phase. However, the court emphasized a crucial constitutional timeline: on the specific date of the notification of elections, the finalized voter list becomes the definitive, unalterable document used for polling purposes. This ruling provides administrative clarity on maintaining clean voter databases while safeguarding the sanctity of the final electoral roll once the official election notification is issued.
Supreme Court Criticises Patna High Court's Salwar-Removal Rape Attempt Ruling
10 Oct 2026
Allahabad HC questions use of term 'Andolanjivi' in official state documents
09 Oct 2026
Supreme Court states Jharkhand DGP appointment process prima facie violates rules
09 Oct 2026
Supreme Court Sets Aside Punjab local Wards Elections
08 Oct 2026