Supreme Court Questions Slum Rehabilitation Near PM Residence

Background: Urban relocation and rehabilitation schemes in India have historically faced criticism for inadequate planning, lack of community consultation, and implementation gaps. Delhi's slum rehabilitation policy aims to provide dignified housing but has often resulted in families being displaced to distant locations, disrupting livelihoods and social networks. The Race Course Road area has been a focus for urban renewal initiatives.

Key Facts: 24,284 rehabilitation flats are available but remain unallocated. Savda Ghera location is 45 km from original residence, creating logistical and economic hardships. DUSIB and state governments were directed to file comprehensive reports justifying the relocation policy and explaining vacant flat allocation criteria. The case involves multiple stakeholder interests—urban development, property rights, and vulnerable population welfare.

Why It Matters: This highlights the tension between urban development imperatives and social justice. The court's intervention exemplifies judicial review of executive decisions affecting fundamental rights. It raises questions about transparent criteria for relocation, community participation, and adequacy of rehabilitation provisions—issues central to India's sustainable urbanization goals.

Exam Angle: UPSC Mains (Constitutional Law, Social Justice, Urban Governance), State PSC. Questions focus on: right to shelter as fundamental right, judicial review scope, rehabilitation standards, vulnerable groups protection, and responsible governance in urban development.